Discrete Fractional Calculus (2015)
3. Nabla Fractional Calculus
3.6. Discrete Nabla Integral
In this section we define the nabla definite and indefinite integral, give several of their properties, and present a nabla fundamental theorem of calculus.
Definition 3.31.
Assume and . Then the nabla integral of f from a to b is defined by
with the convention that
Note that even if f had the domain instead of the value of the integral does not depend on the value of f at a. Also note if , then is defined on with F(a) = 0.
The following theorem gives some important properties of this nabla integral.
Theorem 3.32.
Assume , , b ≤ c ≤ d, and . Then
(i)
(ii)
(iii)
(iv)
(v)
(vi)
if , for then ∇F(t) = f(t), ;
(vii)
if f(t) ≥ g(t) for then .
Proof.
To see that (vi) holds, assume
Then, for , we have that
Hence property (vi) holds. All the other properties of the nabla integral in this theorem hold since the corresponding properties for the summations hold. □
Definition 3.33.
Assume . We say is a nabla antidifference of f(t) on provided
If , then if we define F by
we have from part (vi) of Theorem 3.32 that ∇F(t) = f(t), for , that is, F(t) is a nabla antidifference of f(t) on . Next we show that if , then f(t) has infinitely many antidifferences on .
Theorem 3.34.
If and G(t) is a nabla antidifference of f(t) on , then , where C is a constant, is a general nabla antidifference of f(t) on .
Proof.
Assume G(t) is a nabla antidifference of f(t) on . Let , , where C is a constant. Then
and so, F(t) is a antidifference of f(t) on .
Conversely, assume F(t) is a nabla antidifference of f(t) on . Then
for . This implies , for , where C is a constant. Hence
This completes the proof. □
Definition 3.35.
If , then the nabla indefinite integral of f is defined by
where F(t) is a nabla antidifference of f(t) and C is an arbitrary constant.
Since any formula for a nabla derivative gives us a formula for an indefinite integral, we have the following theorem.
Theorem 3.36.
The following hold:
(i)
(ii)
(iii)
(iv)
(v)
(vi)
(vii)
(viii)
where C is an arbitrary constant.
Proof.
The formula
is clear when α = 0, and for α ≠ 0 it follows from part (iv) of Theorem 3.1. Parts (ii) and (iii) of this theorem follow from the power rules (3.3) and (3.4), respectively. Part (iv) of this theorem follows from part (iv) of Theorem 3.11. Parts (v) and (vi) of this theorem follow from parts (iv) and (iii) of Theorem 3.16, respectively. Finally, parts (vii) and (viii) of this theorem follow from parts (iv) and (iii) of Theorem 3.19, respectively. □
We now state and prove the fundamental theorem for the nabla calculus.
Theorem 3.37 (Fundamental Theorem of Nabla Calculus).
We assume and F is any nabla antidifference of f on . Then
Proof.
By Theorem 3.32, (vi), we have that G defined by , for is a nabla antidifference of f on . Since F is a nabla antidifference of f on , it follows from Theorem 3.34 that , for some constant C. Hence,
This completes the proof. □
Example 3.38.
Assume p ≠ 0, 1 is a constant. Use the integration formula
to evaluate the integral where . We calculate
Check this answer by using part (i) in Theorem 3.36.
Using the product rule (part (v) in Theorem 3.1) we can prove the following integration by parts formulas.
Theorem 3.39 (Integration by Parts).
Given two functions and , b < c, we have the integration by parts formulas:
(3.19)
(3.20)
Example 3.40.
Given for , evaluate the integral . Note that
To set up to use the integration by parts formula (3.19), set
It follows that
Hence, using the integration by parts formula (3.19), we get
for .